On Saturday, Mark Lilla had a column in the Wall Street Journal titled “The Perils of ‘Populist Chic’”. In the column he argued that the conservative movement had been ascendant in America for 40 years because it had been intellectual ascendant. Out of that tradition arose a series of conservative intellectuals (e.g., William F. Buckley, Irving Kristol, Daniel Patrick Moynihan) that, even if one did not agree with them, one had to take seriously. These were folks who were admired for their maturity and seriousness, their historical perspective, their sense of proportion. But, times have changed and the conservative movement in America is now run by folks who no longer see their role educating and enobling a populist political tendency. What had been disdain for liberal intellectuals has morphed into disdain for the intellectual class as a whole.
There was a time when conservative intellectuals raised the level of American public debate and helped to keep it sober. Those days are gone.”
I had recently been mulling over those kinds of thoughts, but needless to say Lilla gave me a more well rounded version of what I had been thinking.